Did you know that the average 8 to 10-year-old spends nearly 8 hours a day with a variety of different media, and older children and teenagers spend more than 11 hours per day1?
Apparently, our young people now spend more time with media than they do in school and, apart from sleeping, it is the leading activity for children and teenagers.1,2 That’s a heck of a lot of time where other people are telling our children what they should think, how they should behave, what they should eat, even how they should look.
Television, the long a popular “babysitter,” remains the dominant medium, but computers, tablets and smartphones are gradually taking over. Nearly one third of television programming is viewed on alternative platforms (computers, iPads, or smartphone). Nearly all children and teenagers have Internet access (84%), often high-speed, and one third have Internet access in their own bedroom.3,4
You might be reading this and thinking, “That’s ridiculous, my young child doesn’t spend that much time on a screen!” But as our children get older, it is not that hard to accrue digital time. Despite all of this media time and new technology, many parents have few rules about the use of media or phones by their children.
In a recent study, two thirds of children and teenagers report that their parents have “no rules” about time spent with media.1 Many young children also watch movies, online, on TV, or in movie theatres, that are rated for older audiences, contain adult content, and are clearly inappropriate for them.5,6 Yep, been there before on occasion. Only to have my tweens finally become more forthright about what horror movie they watched with friends without asking, and subsequently they become too scared to go to sleep.
Most children have multiple devices and I know that in our house, we don’t even have television to contend with, but my tween and teens each have iPads and smartphones. They use iPads at school. Many of their school texts are downloaded onto these devices and they also receive their homework via their iPads. They have smartphones because their school requires students to catch a bus to and from school and, for me, being able to stay in touch with them when they have after school activities or work commitments is imperative. Times are certainly changing.
Yes, it’s essential that our children keep abreast of technology in their ever-changing, fast-paced world. That’s not what we’re questioning. It’s that nagging feeling we all have that too much digital time can’t be a good thing physically and emotionally. You too are probably concerned about what YouTube videos your children might be watching and what age-inappropriate pop up ads might lure them into.
As parents today, we don’t have much experience in this new domain to draw on from our own childhoods, and our parents don’t have much advice to give either – it is indeed a new-age parenting challenge that requires some thought and self-reflection.
Did You Know That:
• 50% of children aged 12-17 send and receive 60 or more text messages a day, and one third send more than 100 per day.3
• One study found that 20% of adolescents had either sent or received a sexually explicit image by smartphone or Internet.7
• 60% of teenagers send 34 text messages on average after getting into bed.8
• For every 4 hours of daily screen time it takes 20 minutes longer for the brain to relax and fall asleep.9
It doesn’t take a mental giant to realise these are valid reasons why so many teens are tired. And as they lean towards communicating via a screen and less face-to-face communication, why so many of them feel lonely, insecure and depressed. There’s no denying that technology is a poor substitute for personal interaction and parental support.
When screens dominate family time we become unable to help our children process events and deal with anxieties.
It’s also not uncommon these days to see toddlers playing on smartphones and iPads. It’s certainly tempting to throw screens at children all day long, giving them distractions so we too can lose ourselves to a screen. It’s easy to have children play digital games like Candy Crush Saga while we are driving or while we wait at a restaurant for dinner, but in doing so our children forgo the opportunity to learn how to engage with the world around them, to day dream, to entertain themselves, to self-soothe and calm themselves down.
If you’re like us you probably already feel concerned about the impact screens are having on your child and you are wondering what on earth to do about it. You may not wish to read further facts and figures about the impact of electronics. The reality is though that unless we build conviction around why too much screen time is harmful physically and mentally, unless we dive into the dangerous side-effects, then it’s far easier to throw in the towel and give in to our children when they rant and rave at us for restricting their access to digital equipment. We have all heard the complaints a thousand times when trying to set boundaries on screen time:
“But we have nothing else to do!”
“You’re so unfair! Everyone else can use their iPads whenever they want!”
The trick is to have a strong foundation for our boundaries so that we don’t become wobbly when our offspring next have a tirade.
Here’s the thing – our minds and bodies reflect what we do with them so the first step to minimising screen time is to uncover and examine the dangers.
THE DANGERS OF TOO MUCH SCREEN TIME
• Research has shown screen time has negative effects on violent and aggressive behaviour, sexuality, academic performance, body concept and self-image, nutrition, dieting, obesity and substance use and abuse patterns.9
Emotional or Behavioural Impact
• Research shows that exposure to TV or computer games affects children’s sleep (particularly if used late in the day or evening) and deteriorates their ability to think clearly, communicate well and overall negatively influences their learning and memory.13
WANT TO KNOW A LITTLE MORE ABOUT ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION?
Electromagnetic (EM) radiation is a form of energy that is all around us and takes many forms such as radio waves, microwaves, X-rays and gamma rays, ultraviolet, visible light and infrared light. It is a form of non-ionizing radiation which we encounter from electrical and communications equipment that excites matter but structurally doesn’t change it. None-the-less, different biological effects are observed for different types of non-ionizing radiation.
There is no evidence to prove that this technology is completely safe and without risks, many countries including France, Russia, Israel, India, Italy, China, Poland, Bulgaria and Switzerland have exposure standards to radiofrequency electromagnetic energy (used in wireless technologies including mobile phones and Wi-Fi) that are one hundred times lower than what is permitted in Australia and the US.23
According to the Council of Europe, “Waiting for high levels of scientific proof before acting on electromagnetic fields can lead to very high health and economic costs as was the case with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.”17
Some sources of electromagnetic radiation include:
• Computers, printers, scanners, game-boys, & televisions
Wireless internet is different to the frequencies used in radio and TV, this technology uses a pulsed microwave radiation like mobile phones, except it does so on a continual basis. There is growing concern amongst parents, teachers and scientists about its impact on children to the extent that many schools in the UK, France, Austria and Israel are removing them.22
According to Nicole Bijlsma17 a building biologist and author of the best seller – Healthy Home Healthy Family, “Questions about the safety of electromagnetic fields in our homes were first raised by Wertheimer and Leeper in 1979 who associated the incidence of childhood leukaemia with exposure to high voltage transmission lines. Since then there have been a flood of studies on the adverse health effects associated with electromagnetic field exposure typically found in the built environment.
Because of the weight of this evidence, the International Agency for Research on Cancer 24 classified extra low frequency magnetic fields and radiofrequency electromagnetic fields used in Wi-Fi and telecommunications as Group 2B carcinogens i.e. possibly carcinogenic to humans. Had they deemed this technology to be safe and without risks to human health, they would have classified them as Group 4 not a carcinogen, but this was not the case. Consequently, countries like China, Switzerland, Italy and Russia have set exposure standards well below that recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection.”
Occasional exposure to high electromagnetic fields is not likely to pose a health risk to most people; however, exposure to high electric and/or magnetic fields over a long period (such as when sleeping) are when problems are likely to arise.18
Adverse health effects that are occurring in people sensitive to this type of radiation include25:
• headaches, sleep disturbances and dizziness
• brain fog: poor memory, poor concentration, dyslexia, learning disorders
• heart problems: chest tightness, increased heart rate (tachycardia) and irregular beats (arrhythmias)
• muscle aches and pains, muscle weakness, and other fibromyalgia symptoms
• skin rash, burning sensations, itch, redness
Studies have also looked at links between EMR and brain tumours, Alzheimer’s, thyroid effects, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, heart problems and reproductive problems.25
Bijlsma continues, “Studies on the impact of mobile phones and wireless technology on children bring up ethical and moral dilemmas that few in the scientific community are willing to pursue. In addition, apart from the threat of litigation, governments are reluctant to acknowledge adverse health effects because they have embraced the technology and in some states made it mandatory for all new school buildings, they rely on the millions of dollars in tax revenue, and lastly they recognise that consumers are demanding the technology.
Likewise, the telecommunications industry needs to ensure dividends for its shareholders. This may explain the lack of data available on children and yet we are exposing millions of them to this technology both in our schools and homes every day. This was recently acknowledged by the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Authority who in February stated ‘due to the lack of scientific evidence on mobile and cordless phone use by children, we recommend that parents encourage their children to limit their exposure.”17
WHAT CAN WE DO TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN FROM THESE DANGERS?
Given the evidence, facts and figures above regarding the dangers of too much screen time, what can we do to help our children?
Our families are certainly not immune to the demands of our “plugged in” world but we do however believe there is a way to strike a balance. In the Well Fed Kids App, we go through A 6 Step Process for Screenoholic Families, with strategies and solutions to help your family get over screen addiction ☺. Sometimes we all lose our way or our children stretch the boundaries, and we must circle back to the ground rules and mark our scent again.
1. Council on Communications and Media. ‘Children, Adolescents, and the Media’, Paediatrics, November 2013, VOLUME 132 / ISSUE 5
• Rideout V. (2010) ‘Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds’, Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA.
2. Strasburger VC, Jordan AB, Donnerstein E. (2010) ‘Health effects of media on children and adolescents’, paediatrics, 2010;125(4):756–767pmid:20194281
3. Lenhart A. ‘Teens and sexting’, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC, December 15, 2009. www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Teens_and_Sexting.pdf. Accessed February 29, 2012
4. Nielsen Company. Television, Internet and Mobile Usage in the U.S. A2/M2 Three Screen Report. New York, NY: Nielsen Company; 2009
5. American Academy of paediatrics, Council on Communications and Media. ‘Policy statement: sexuality, contraception, and the media’,. paediatrics. 2010;126(3):576–582pmid:20805150
6. American Academy of paediatrics, Council on Communications and Media. ‘Policy statement: children, adolescents, substance abuse, and the media’, paediatrics. 2010;126(4):791–799pmid:20876181
7. National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy (2008) ‘Sex and Tech’, National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, Washington DC.
8. Van den Bulck J. ‘Adolescent use of mobile phones for calling and for sending text messages after lights out: results from a prospective cohort study with a one-year follow-up’, Sleep. 2007;30(9):1220–1223pmid:17910394
9. The American Journal of Family Therapy, ‘Examining the Interface of Family and Personal Traits, Media, and Academic Imperatives Using the Learning Habit Study’ (http://goodparentinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/UAFT_A_935684.pdf
• Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, et al. ‘Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth’, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8:98. 2011.
• Goldeld GS, Saunders TJ, Kenny GP, Hadjiyannakis S, Phillips P, Alberga AS, et al. ‘Screen viewing and diabetes risk factors in overweight and obese adolescents’, Am J Prev Med 44(4 Suppl 4):S364–70. 2013. 3
• Mark AE, Janssen I. ‘Relationship between screen time and metabolic syndrome in adolescents’, J Public Health (Oxf) 30(2):153–60. 2008.
11. ‘Study Makes Surprising Link Between TV Time and Childhood Obesity’, Los Angeles Times (http://www.latimes.com/science/la-sci-sn-one-hour-tv-watching-overweight-obese-20150426-story.html)
12. National Institutes of Health; U.S. National Library of Medicine. ‘Screen time and children’, MedLine Plus Medical Encyclopedia (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/patientinstructions/000355.htm)
• Dworak, M., Schierl, T., Bruns, T., Klaus Struder, H. ‘Impact of Singular Excessive Computer Game and Television Exposure on Sleep Patterns and Memory Performance of School-aged Children’, Pediatrics 2007; 120(5):978-985.
• American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Public Education. ‘Children, adolescents and television’, Pediatrics. 2001; 107(2).
• ‘Examining the Interface of Family and Personal Traits, Media, and Academic Imperatives Using the Learning Habit Study’, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 00:1–17, 2014
• Cain, N., & Gradisar, M. (2010). ‘Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review’, Sleep Medicine, 11(8), 735–742. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.006
• Owens, J., Maxim, R., McGuinn, M., Nobile, C., Msall, M., & Alario, A. (1999). ‘Television-viewing habits and sleep disturbances in school children’, Pediatrics, 104(3), e27.
• Griegel-Morris, P., Larson, K, et al. ‘Incidence of Common Postural Abnormalities in the Cervical, Shoulder and Thoracic Regions and their Association with Pain in Two Age Group of Healthy Subjects’, Physical Therapy. 72(6),425-431.(FHP)
• Bavelier, D., Green, C.S., Dye, M.W.G. ‘Children, Wired: For Better and for Worse’, Neuron, 2010; 67: 692-701.
• Strasburger VC, Jordan, AB, Donnerstein E. ‘Health Effects of Media on Children and Adolescents’, Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):756-767. PMID: 20194281
• Neil K Kaneshiro MD, ‘Screen Time and Children’ https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000355.htm
• Zimmerman, F.J., Christakis, D.A., Meltzoff, A.N. ‘Associations between media viewing and language development in children under age 2 years’, Journal of Pediatrics. 2007; 151, 364–368.
17. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly 6 May 2011. The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment report, Doc. 12608 (Online). Available: http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/workingdocs/doc11/edoc12608.htm
18. Douglas A. Gentile Æ J. Ronald Gentile. J. ‘Violent Video Games as Exemplary Teachers: A Conceptual Analysis’, Youth Adolescence 3 July 2007
19. DuRant RH, Rich M, Emans SJ, Rome ES, Allred E, Woods ER. ‘Violence and weapon carrying in music videos: a content analysis’, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:443–448
20. Cantor J. ”Mommy, I’m Scared”: How TV and Movies Frighten Children and What We Can Do to Protect Them. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace; 1998
21. Cantor J, Nathanson AI. ‘Children’s fright reactions to television news’, J Commun. 1996;46:139–152
• Powerwatch, 2013. Schools without Wi-Fi. (Online). Available: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/ rf/schools_without_wifi.asp
• France, EHS Refuge Zone “How it works”. (Online). Available: http://www.next-up.org/ Newsoftheworld/EHS_Refuge_Zone.php
• Countries that recognise Electrical Hypersensitivity as a functional disability include Sweden, Canada, France, Spain and the United States.
• German Parliament, 2007. Letter from the German Federal Ministries for the Environment Nature Protection and Reactor Safety. (Online). Available: http://www.icems.eu/docs/deutscher_ bundestag.pdf
23. Nicole Bijlsma. Wireless Technology – A Danger We Can’t Live Without. ACNEM Journal. Vol 32(1). pp17-20
24. World Health Organisation, IARC Monographs of the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 2002, Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields. Vol. 80, IARC Press. (Online). Available: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ ENG/Monographs/vol80/volume80.pdf
• Philips, A and Philips, J, n.d, Radiofrequency EMFs and health risks. (Online). Available: www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/index.asp
• Electromagnetic fields – we live in a sea of radiation. Nicole Bijlsma. http://www.buildingbiology.com.au/index.php/Biology/Electromagnetic-Fields.html